What i want to add is decrease xdai to 10 percent or 5 percent. For smaller purchases it can be used. I dont think we should put liq on eth sidechain so dex’s on polkadot will be better if theres any. However with massive user base and low fees for now bsc will be a good move for hopr to increase recognition level. but we should watch out for price fluctuations.
Also change liq levels according to volume every year.
We dont want to list everywhere to mot loosing track. Uniswap and 1 low fee dex is enough for now.
What i propose is;
5% xdai honey
60% uniswap
35% bsc~adding high liq prevent pumps and dumps
Your proposal is good. Have you considered another DEX instead of Polygon Quickswap such as Raydium DEX on solana?(as I described in my proposal).
It has a higher rating and possibly more potential in the future.
Proposal sounds great but until some cex can change chain on bsc will cause huge commission size on bridge(for example if MXC will have it, so it will be cheaper send hopr on it in etherium chain and send it to the wallet in bsc chain).
polygon sounds like a right choice but still in early stages of adoption. Some platforms are growing fast and may overtake quickswap. Dfyn network could be the right choice according to its trajectory. Said that, I think this proposal is the most fair so far.
BSC might be an option if we believe that binance has plans to list hopr finally. Otherwise splashing liquidity will lead to further price dump.
As for HoneySwap we don’t need any liquidity there untill we can use wxhopr to run nodes.
The healthiest and most balanced decision of all the proposed ones. The Polygon network is gaining momentum very much now, and at the same time it has a much more friendly look, in contrast to Solana and Polkadot (namely, they want to actively implement them now). I will not argue with the percentage, it will be decided by the vote, but I would change it.