Minimum time needed to draw meaningful conclusions
This discussion is intended for people who think this time should be greater than zero. If you don’t think either project should be chosen, you’ll have the opportunity to support this preference elsewhere.
How long should the first trial phase of this liquidity management experiment run for?
That’s how I understood your previous reply, too. Glad this is confirmed and this does seem like a red flag to me. Is their stance reasonable is the main question? I would need more details on what kind of money we are talking about and a better understanding on if their stance is reasonable. Do we end negotiations? Do we make the test period one year to avoid the lose? Do we stick with a shorter test period and eat the lose? Will they bend on this? Worth saying, the above poll should be suspended until these details are clearly understood by the people voting.
My gut says no here. Thinking about the 1% AUM is what initially made me wonder how we were defining success. I’m curious as to whether the 50% of trade fees that the DAO would get would make up for the 1% AUM.
None of the proposals up for vote say anything about Arrakis taking the whole years worth of fees even if the trial period ends sooner. I suspect alot of people do not read every comment on every thread, so I can see people making an uninformed vote. Voters need to be aware of what they are actually voting for, including the fine print.