Hi @svd. Thanks for the proposal. I’m afraid I’ve tagged it as invalid for now. To make it valid, I’d need to see more details to meet the validity criteria outlined in this post: http://forum.hoprnet.org/t/updated-proposals-making-proposals-validity-rules-and-template
Feel free to use the template there if it would help. @jayveq and I are also around to answer any questions.
Hi @svd Thanks for the updates. I don’t think it’s valid yet, but I think it’s now clearer what the issues are. I’m going to change the tag to incomplete.
Some questions to help make this valid:
My interpretation of that is that you want to order the distribution based on three criteria, in order of priority:
Is that right?
Hi @thewanderingeditor .
Yes, they sign via the form.
Yes, based on NFTs.
My metric is very simple. We have NFT HODLER (Four ranks, 2.5% — 10% Boost). We use only this type of NFT for ordering.
Yes, if NFT is equals, then HOPR Stake.
SQL syntax:
select TOP N from registered_users
where (NFT is not null && TOKENS is not null)
order by NFT DESC, TOKENS DESC
Where NFT is HODLER NFT percents (10%, 7.5%, 5%, 2.5%) and TOKENS is Hopr token amount in stack.
I want to stress my concerns one more time that this is non-inclusive and thus unfair.
Thanks @svd. I think that’s now clear and this is a valid proposal. You can see it in the official list here: http://forum.hoprnet.org/t/proposal-10-support-strong-holders-and-node-runners-through-hopr-hardware-device-free-distribution
Anyone who supports this proposal, please follow the link and sign the proposal by clicking the heart (like) button.
With my moderator’s hat on, I feel this is a valid proposal and should go onto the official list. With my team member’s hat on, I agree with @Jones_05 that this isn’t a particularly inclusive idea.
While increasing the number of hardware nodes out there feels like a worthy goal, I feel like HOPR holders are already likely to be running nodes, so all this is doing is replacing a perfectly good home of VPS node with a more expensive hardware one.
I also think there would be better NFT-based metrics for assigning nodes than the HODLR NFTs alone, which is much more likely to correlate with whales. Even something as simple as “most NFTs” is more likely to reward active users.
@thewanderingeditor , thanks!
To @all
NB! Please vote for this proposal again by click on heart (like) at the proposal page - PROPOSAL 10: Support strong holders and node runners through HOPR hardware device free distribution
Do no click only on heart at this page. Please go to official proposal page (link is above)! Otherwise we will lost your vote!
You may need a complex weighted criterion, for example order by A * NFT + B * TOKENS or something similar
I don’t think this offer is fair. It will be unfair to those who have given money before. The $500 hardware price is not high for the Hopr investor. Anyone who really wants to be a node relay can do it with a vps. It makes more sense to use DAI to attract new investors rather than existing ones.
Good idea
This propolas is fair, because Hopr already was supported old customers - HOPR joins in AVADO’s new NFT-based Rewards Program. They returned their money back.
Thank you! Please vote for this proposal at the proposal page -PROPOSAL 10: Support strong holders and node runners through HOPR hardware device free distribution Thank you in advance!
What you said is wrong. Only the first 300 Avado purchasers were awarded 500 Hopr tokens. That currently makes $125. However, $500 was paid. This was the rewards program. There is a promotional offer in the same way as the Hopr Token Proposal 3 (Grow the Hopr Hardware Node) prepared by the team. That would be fair. What you suggest is not fair. I think it should be spent on reaching new investors instead of giving away hardware nodes for free.
At that time it was ~$400.
Give 500 Hopr for hardware buyers - it’s fair. Give 500 DAI for hardware buyers - it’s not fair? Are you seriously? I thinks it is the same.
It’s democracy. You always can create your own proposal :)
Giving 500 Hopr is not the same as spending 500 DAI and getting hardware nodes. It doesn’t matter if it’s worth $400 then. Do you think someone who buys an Avado is selling 500 Hopr? First, those who received the Avado Node were unaware of this award. It was announced long after they bought it. It was an airdrop. Think of it as a reward for those who trust the team and get hardware nodes. Secondly, this offer would be good for me too. I have been involved in the project from the very beginning. But it would still be unfair to those who give money. Of course this is my opinion. You can write whatever you want 
I think, yes. First investment rule - return your investment, if it is possible.
They can get the second device 
Thank you for your opinion. Many people, many opinions. It’s normal 
I am opposed to your proposal.
It’s better if we manage to use these funds to expand and attract more people…
My proposal idea is totally different. It’s not advertising proposal. The main idea of my proposal expand hopr node chain and support node validators. But you can create your own proposal 
This is from the official ‘guideline’:
"Most importantly, only proposals which will grow the HOPR project and ecosystem in the medium to long-term will be considered.
Could you elaborate on how your proposal fulfills this requirement?
You already haven’t read the medium article about the DAO (see the telegram chat), this is why I provide you this piece of rather essential information.