Hi @svd Thanks for the updates. I don’t think it’s valid yet, but I think it’s now clearer what the issues are. I’m going to change the tag to incomplete.
Some questions to help make this valid:
What do you mean by “After then we select TOP “N” (or smaller/bigger) ordered first by Hopr NFT for stacking (Diamond, Gold, Silver) and, after then, by Hopr token count in Hopr stacking.”
My interpretation of that is that you want to order the distribution based on three criteria, in order of priority:
Did they sign up via the form?
If yes to 1), then use a metric based on NFTs
If 2) is tied(?) use a metric based on HOPR stake
Is that right?
and 3) are clear, but 2) seems uncertain to me. Can you elaborate on what you’re suggesting here? I can see how this matches with other parts of your proposal (for example, I agree that people with more NFTs are more likely to be active participants than whales) but I don’t think it’s quite clear enough for this to be a valid proposal yet.
With my moderator’s hat on, I feel this is a valid proposal and should go onto the official list. With my team member’s hat on, I agree with @Jones_05 that this isn’t a particularly inclusive idea.
While increasing the number of hardware nodes out there feels like a worthy goal, I feel like HOPR holders are already likely to be running nodes, so all this is doing is replacing a perfectly good home of VPS node with a more expensive hardware one.
I also think there would be better NFT-based metrics for assigning nodes than the HODLR NFTs alone, which is much more likely to correlate with whales. Even something as simple as “most NFTs” is more likely to reward active users.
I don’t think this offer is fair. It will be unfair to those who have given money before. The $500 hardware price is not high for the Hopr investor. Anyone who really wants to be a node relay can do it with a vps. It makes more sense to use DAI to attract new investors rather than existing ones.
What you said is wrong. Only the first 300 Avado purchasers were awarded 500 Hopr tokens. That currently makes $125. However, $500 was paid. This was the rewards program. There is a promotional offer in the same way as the Hopr Token Proposal 3 (Grow the Hopr Hardware Node) prepared by the team. That would be fair. What you suggest is not fair. I think it should be spent on reaching new investors instead of giving away hardware nodes for free.
Giving 500 Hopr is not the same as spending 500 DAI and getting hardware nodes. It doesn’t matter if it’s worth $400 then. Do you think someone who buys an Avado is selling 500 Hopr? First, those who received the Avado Node were unaware of this award. It was announced long after they bought it. It was an airdrop. Think of it as a reward for those who trust the team and get hardware nodes. Secondly, this offer would be good for me too. I have been involved in the project from the very beginning. But it would still be unfair to those who give money. Of course this is my opinion. You can write whatever you want
My proposal idea is totally different. It’s not advertising proposal. The main idea of my proposal expand hopr node chain and support node validators. But you can create your own proposal
"Most importantly, only proposals which will grow the HOPR project and ecosystem in the medium to long-term will be considered.
Could you elaborate on how your proposal fulfills this requirement?
You already haven’t read the medium article about the DAO (see the telegram chat), this is why I provide you this piece of rather essential information.
I think that’s now clear and this is a valid proposal
I think it’s means, that my proposal is fulfills all requirements.
I also had answered to this question above. More nodes, more security etc.
It was some day ago, and I admit my mistake. I didn’t read one topic about rules changing in HOPR proposals. But this is Dai proposal and this is not connected.
But I think, that you are at the wrong way:
Every day you spend time to write something bad about my proposal without any suggestions. It’s not constructive. We need to discuss, but you didn’t continue your previous topic, didn’t propose any idea and didn’t answer for my questions. Unfortunately, you are only negative and critic :)
I think it will be better if you used your energy to popularise your proposal neither calumniate other proposals
It is not my fail, that my proposal is the one of most populars in Hopr community. Many people like it and that means, that I’m at the right way
You may need a complex weighted criterion, for example order by A * NFT + B * TOKENS or something similar
Thank you for your opinion. Many people, many opinions. It’s normal 
