Uni 40%, pancake, 20%, raydium 10%,quickswap 10%,honeyswap 20%

HOPR DAO v0.1 Discussions
1
  1. uni v3 - 40% The most popular exchanger. It is necessary to transfer liquidity to v.3. Many advantages over v.2
  2. pancake v2 - 20% There are also a lot of users. Fast and cheap translations. Access to a lot of defi tools
  3. raydium - 10% A fast-growing network with growing volumes. Fast and cheap
  4. quickswap - 10% The same as the above
  5. honeyswap - 20% A good exchanger is more necessary technically to maintain output input and start hopr nodes

I think that so many supported networks and exchangers are more than enough. At the same time, each will be supported with sufficient liquidity for the initial placement.

4 Likes
2

What about the pairs?

3

It’s time to move away from high commissions in such networks as solana.

4

it seems to me that there is no need to split liquidity so much across different dex. I think this may negatively affect.

5

Split liquidity across different dex seems hard to balance with native token(eth, sol, bnb), so I think the hopr-DAI pair best meets the needs

6

Your opinion is very reasonable， but solana has a very high impact. Maybe we could move away in the future?

7

why? Is there any reason?