- uni v3 - 40% The most popular exchanger. It is necessary to transfer liquidity to v.3 (fee tier: 0.30%, price range: unlimited). Many advantages over v.2
- pancake v2 - 30% There are also a lot of users. Fast and cheap translations. Access to a lot of defi tools
- quickswap - 20% The same as the above. Not so large trading volumes so the percentage of liquidity is lower
- honeyswap - 10% A good exchanger is more necessary technically to maintain output input and start hopr nodes.
I think that so many supported networks and exchangers are more than enough. At the same time, each will be supported with sufficient liquidity for the initial placement. of course, all trading pairs are hopr/dai. I think this is understandable.
I think the Near network has a very great future, but their Ref. finance has not yet been audited or officially launched. At the same time, there is a bridge with ether, aurora allows you to use all applications for ethereum only on Near. As well as a portal for Dao communities with the necessary spitnik.fund tools. Perhaps the hopr team will want to consider a partnership with them in the future. It’s a personal wish.
Hi. Would you like to make this an official proposal? I haven’t considered it so far, because you didn’t have “Proposal” in the title.
If you do, then I’ll point out that you need to specify the fee tier and price range for Uni v3, and also unfortunately we cannot support Raydium because Solana doesn’t currently have secure multi-sig support.
Hello. Yes, of course I would. I’ll edit everything now